What Wikipedia Can Teach Us About the Future of AI — and Why Brands Should Pay Attention
September 15, 2025
METRIC CENTRIC
Tags
- AEO
- AI analytics
- Answer Engine Optimization
- artificial intelligence
- Conversational Analytics
- Conversational Data
- customer perception
- Data Analytics
- Generative Engine Optimization
- GEO
- Voice of the Customer
- Wikipedia
Contributing Authors:
Michael B. Snead – Business Advisor @ Metric Centric
George Assimakopoulos – Managing Principal @ Metric Centric
If you were a student in the mid-2000s, you probably remember being told Wikipedia was off-limits.
Like the cookie jar you weren’t supposed to touch, it sat at the top of every Google search — tempting, convenient, but prohibited. Teachers warned it was full of errors. Anyone could change it. It was taboo in academic settings, and students who gave in were punished.
But outside the classroom, Wikipedia became indispensable. For millions of curious readers, it was the fastest way to get oriented on any topic. Over time, it wasn’t banned — it was redefined. Used properly, it became a launchpad, even in academics: not the final word, but a powerful way to discover primary sources.
Sound familiar? Two decades later, AI engines like ChatGPT and Google Gemini are more modern examples of the same debate.
Wikipedia and today’s AI tools have more similarities than differences. In the AI era, we can learn from Wikipedia, not just from its acceptance by society and scholars, but its process.
Wikipedia isn’t powerful because it’s perfect. It’s powerful because it’s transparent, constantly updated, and community audited. AI could work the same way, but it’s up to brands, not the internet at large, to curate their story in the age of AI.
Why Wikipedia?
Wikipedia is one of the largest, most-trusted, and most-used knowledge platforms in the world. What makes it powerful is the constant iteration, transparency, and collective oversight.
Articles are edited, debated, corrected, and cited in real time. In many ways, this community-driven feedback loop is the best early model for how AI systems are — and should be — shaped.
What makes Wikipedia work isn’t just the information — it’s the process behind the information.
- Anyone can contribute, but not without accountability
- Every edit is logged, tracked, and timestamped
- Community moderators review changes and enforce guidelines
- Sources must be cited, and unverifiable claims get flagged
Now imagine if AI worked the same way.
- Transparency and Sources Matter – Wikipedia lives and dies on citations. Similarly, AI engines need structured, reliable, and attributable sources to generate trustworthy answers
- Continuous Training – Just as Wikipedia articles evolve, brands need to recognize that AI’s perception of them will never be “set and done.” It requires ongoing monitoring and updating
- Community Influence – Wikipedia reflects what people contribute. AI reflects what it consumes. If misinformation dominates communities, that narrative gets amplified
This would shift AI from a mystery box to a verifiable system — and for brands, that’s game-changing.
Why Brands Should Care (a Lot)
Wikipedia became a default “source of truth” in the 2000s. Today, AI answers are quickly becoming the front door to brand perception.
That means:
- Inaccuracies or outdated content about your brand can ripple faster than ever once AI systems pick them up
- Brands that feed AI with structured, authoritative, and clear content (think: FAQs, tutorials, schema-rich metadata, and even Wikipedia itself) will shape how they appear in AI engine answers
- You’re not just competing to rank anymore. You’re competing to be learned from
How to do as Wikipedia does
The playbook already exists. It starts with listening to your audience.
Your customers are telling you:
- What questions they have
- What terms they use
- What they’re confused by
- What experiences they expect
All of that is fuel for:
- Updating brand-owned knowledge bases
- Publishing clearer, structured content for AI to consume
- Flagging when AI-generated answers miss the mark
Think of your customers as editors of the AI narrative. You just have to listen!
If Wikipedia taught us that the crowd could shape knowledge, AI is teaching us that the data shapes perception. The question for brands is: Who’s curating your story in the age of AI — the internet at large or you?
To learn more about how to shape your story in the AI era, reach out to us at Metric Centric!
Related
Blog Posts
Contributing Authors: Michael B. Snead – Business Advisor @ Metric Centric George Assimakopoulos – Managing Principal @ Metric Centric Not long ago, brand communication was a two-way street: the brand and the customer. You launched campai...
Contributing Authors: Michael B. Snead – Business Advisor @ Metric Centric George Assimakopoulos – Managing Principal @ Metric Centric AI is rewriting the rules of visibility. What makes it revolutionary isn’t just speed or scale — it’s t...
Contributing Authors: Michael B. Snead – Business Advisor @ Metric Centric George Assimakopoulos – Managing Principal @ Metric Centric Readers of the Chicago Sun-Times and the Philadelphia Inquirer were stunned this spring when they opene...